Engineers at The Barden Corporation have adopted a combination of ‘Design of Experiments’ methods and FAST analysis techniques to optimise the performance and cost of bearing designs for a manufacturer of high speed rotary machines.


On a design project at The Barden Corporation (UK) based in Plymouth, design engineers have adopted a novel combination of structured design methods and test analysis techniques to optimise the performance and cost of a range of bearings. These super precision angular contact and deep groove ball bearings are for a customer that manufactures high speed rotary machines.

The project was carried out in collaboration with the customer. The two methods used were the Function Analysis System Technique (FAST) and Design of Experiments (DoE); both are popular systems analysis and problem solving techniques which can be applied not just to bearing design, but to any engineered system, mechanical design or production process.

‘This is the first time that Barden engineers have used these particular methods together in this way,’ explains Nick Dowding, Business Development Manager at Barden. ‘Normally, we would look at a customer’s application and then design a bearing solution to suit, then cost that bearing. However, on this particular project, the customer wanted us to investigate and develop a range of different high precision ball bearings for use on its range of high speed rotary machines. The idea was that after the project was complete, the customer could then select the optimal bearing solution for several machine variants with respect to performance and cost.’

FAST was developed during the Value Engineering revolution in the 1960s and is a rigorous method for understanding complex systems by converting the activities performed in a system to the functions performed by the system for its customers. System engineers and Value Analysis specialists use this method for product and process improvement, systems design and systems architecture. Design engineers at Barden used FAST to optimise the cost of the bearings, whilst adopting DoE methods to optimise the performance of the bearings. Dowding explains further: ‘First, we had to look at what the bearings were required to do in terms of their key functions, from an end application viewpoint. We had to ask ourselves questions, such as what it is that the bearings have to provide for the application or machine to make it operate effectively.’

Examples of key functions for a bearing are to minimise machine and shaft related noise and vibration and to ensure that the machine’s life was maximised. Parasitic losses in the machine’s mechanical drive system also had to be minimised. The bearings also control shaft position and so needed to cope with the operating speeds related to this. Once the key bearing functions were identified, says Dowding, the chosen method by which the bearing would achieve these functions had to be listed. ‘For example, in order to achieve the required life of the machine, a range of bearing factors come into play, including lubrication, cleanliness, temperature control, method of retaining the lubricant, bearing cage design, and so on. The basic idea here is to identify what functions the bearing brings to the party.’

Based on this, a list of bearing requirements was then drawn up. The completed list included 25 different bearing requirements, including clearances, run-out and vibration harmonics. ‘What we did next was to put these bearing functions and requirements into a matrix, whereby we could score or weight the functions accordingly. In order to score each function, we had to decide, for example, whether the stiffness of the bearing was more important for the application than the bearing clearance; or whether the bearing run out was more important than both of these. Eventually, the completed matrix included a weighting for every bearing feature placed in order of their importance to the application.’

Next, Barden was able to apply FAST cost optimisation techniques to each function. ‘We had to allocate individual costs associated with each stage of manufacture to each function, including raw material costs, inspection and turning of the inner and outer rings. More than 30 separate bearing production steps were considered and scored against the bearing functions.’ This exercise, says Dowding, enabled the engineers to demonstrate to the customer which bearing features were costing the most, but contributing the least to the performance of the bearing in the specific application. ‘In effect, you end up with the most important bearing functions at the top of the matrix, which also happen to be the most expensive ones to manufacture. The features at the bottom tend to be the opposite - the least important functions but which are inexpensive to produce. We focused our efforts on the middle range, where the bearing functions were deemed to be relatively important to the application and where the manufacturing costs were relatively expensive.’

‘We then looked at the manufacturing steps in detail and refined the process to suit the machine application. For example, we decided that it wasn’t necessary to carry out 100% functional testing on every bearing we produced. Sample functional testing was deemed sufficient. Similarly, we agreed with the customer not to inspect all the bearings after the turning process. The cost of manufacturing could therefore be reduced whilst still meeting the bearing performance criteria.’

According to Dowding, the project was an unprecedented success and resulted in a range of bearing solutions that were optimised in terms of their performance for a range of machine variants, but which also, on average, cost the customer 10-20% less. For each machine model, the customer was able to select a bearing solution that was most appropriate, for example, a high cost high performing bearing could be chosen for a high end rotary machine, or a relatively inexpensive, adequate performing bearing for a mid-range model. ‘By adequate, we mean that the bearing’s performance was deemed sufficient for the application requirements for machine life’ says Nick Dowding. ‘In effect, the customer got to choose from a premium bearing solution or a budget option.’

Other News:
FAG Bearings India Net Surges 81.64% for Jun`10 qtr
Optimising Super Precision Bearings
Schaeffler boosts Asian presence‎
RBC Bearings (ROLL) Crosses Pivot Point Resistance at $30.73
NSK Introduces ES1 Stainless Bearing Steel
RBC Bearings Wins Komatsu America 2009 Delivery/Availability Award
Trade Court Rebukes ITC Again for Ball Bearing Dumping Decision
ITC Releases New Dumping Duties