The Timken Company (USA) reported "disappointing" second quarter 2003 results, the result of unfortunate surprises in the Torrington acquisition, general weakness in its markets, some short-term operating inefficiencies, and unexpectedly energy and raw materials costs in the steel business.

Timken went on to cut estimates for the year, citing no apparent overall upturn in their combined markets despite some scattered improvements. The few market segments that do show promise are being more than offset by those segments continuing to contract, particularly industrial. President and CEO Jim Griffith said in the earnings conference call, "We don't see the turnaround coming until sometime in mid-2004." Chairman W.R. "Tim" Timken said, "...the long-awaited recovery in industrial markets will not take place in the next six months."

For the quarter, Timken reported sales of $990.3 million, up from $660.8 million a year ago, due primarily to the Torrington acquisition.

Excluding the added Torrington sales and currency effects involved in international transactions, the organic sales increase was only 2.5% over 2002.

Earnings for the quarter were $3.92 million (0.4% of sales), down from $3.96 million (0.6% of sales) in 2002, reflecting what Mr. Griffith termed, "artificially depressed" results traceable to Torrington acquisition expenses. Analysts had expected Timken to earn approximately $20 million (2% of sales), which has led to a number of downgrades.

However, Mr. Timken, and others echoed, the company is still on track to achieve the projected $20 million annualized cost savings from the Torrington acquisition by the end of the fiscal year. In particular, he said the company is moving rapidly to capture synergies in leveraging its purchasing power.

Some of Timken's unexpected setbacks in the quarter came directly from Torrington, even though as Mr. Timken said, "The integration is proceeding quickly, by any measure."

The strongest negative impact from Torrington came through its distribution chain. While Timken was investigating the acquisition, Torrington's, parent Ingersoll-Rand had Torrington aggressively price-cutting and cramming the distribution channels with needle bearings. Torrington distributors, said Timken, took unusually large buys during this period.

Mr. Griffith said this excess inventory was identified by Timken as an issue during the due diligence phase, so it was not a big surprise. What did surprise Timken and impact earnings this quarter is that it has taken much longer than expected to burn off that inventory in this economic climate.

As a result of this slow inventory selloff, Torrington's sales thorough these "critical" industrial aftermarket channels was far lower than projected for the quarter, accounting for 10% of the earnings shortfall.

Timken management was, however, uncharacteristically candid about Torrington's operation by Ingersoll-Rand in the final months between the end of due diligence, the signing of the purchase agreement and early February 2003 when Timken officially took over Torrington.

Specifically, Ingersoll-Rand's, "...well-conceived cost savings programs were not undertaken by Torrington last year leading up to the acquisition," said Mr. Griffith. I-R simply put all spending on hold; "They went on and operated their business."

Asked why Timken was not aware Torrington's restructuring and investment activities had been stopped, Mr. Griffith pointed out Timken had limited access to Torrington during that critical period. He said, "we did not know that" about I-R until after Timken owned it. The impact of I-R's failure to continue Torrington restructuring, "emerged over the period of the second quarter," he said. "Are we disappointed that they did it? Yes." But Mr. Griffith went on to emphasize that most of the stalled restructuring projects were identified immediately and have already been done. Even so, he said, I-R's failure to pursue those projects resulted in Timken shouldering higher costs for their completion and lower productivity during their execution.

Another of Torrington's surprise negative impacts on earnings came from the new automotive plant in the Czech Republic, a project which is not coming along smoothly. Mr. Griffith said "more challenging" operating problems have surfaced than expected, and they will probably not be resolved until the first half of 2004.

Temporary inefficiencies affected earnings during the quarter. Timken's Manufacturing Strategy Initiative (MSI) aligning products with their least-cost worldwide production facilities, resulted in some transient operating inefficiencies which hurt earnings slightly.

Timken is also in the process of converting from tube to forged slugs for its high-volume bearings. That program had setbacks in the quarter via delays in the Kentucky plant ramp-up and startup problems with external forging suppliers.

Finally, the other major impact on Timken's earnings were due to, "unforeseen steel business cost issues," in significantly higher raw materials and energy costs. Steel's higher costs were compounded by weakness in aerospace and general industrial sectors. The company said it expects to see continued high raw material and inventory costs, while scrap reverses, amid continued weak demand. The company said, "We do not see signs of a 2003 American industrial manufacturing recovery."

In all, Timken said half of the second quarter earnings shortfall was due to cost issues in the steel business, and half due to situations in the bearing businesses. Approximately 80% of the shortfall on the bearing side was due to automotive, and 20% industrial.

Winding up the earnings call, Mr. Griffith said all of the internal problems and situations which contributed to the second quarter operating earnings shortfall were essentially temporary operating issues and, "these are being corrected as we speak." He went on to point out that the Torrington acquisition momentum is growing and the synergies are beginning to play out in terms of higher sales opportunities that neither company could have achieved separately. For example, he cited the company's industrial sales improvement, despite the flat market conditions.

For the coming quarters, Mr. Griffith said Torrington expects, "a gradual ramp up of shipments," as distributor inventory is burned off. North American production of passenger cars and light trucks is expected to soften, while industrial markets stay flat. As a result, Timken has lowered its earnings guidance for the full year to between $0.80 and $0.95 per share, down from the initially projected $1.25.

Timken was hit by numerous downgrades for the surprise earnings miss. CIBC World Markets, BB&T Capital Markets (strong buy to buy), Merrill Lynch (buy to neutral), and Wachovia (outperform to market perform) were downgrades, and some were strongly worded. Merrill Lynch said, "We felt this was a critical quarter for Timken to build investor confidence in its restructuring and integration plans." Wachovia expressed concern about Timken management credibility, with two consecutive quarters coming well short of guidance and noted it believed second half prospects were, "poor."

S&P did not downgrade the Timken but warned there is "limited room at the current ratings and outlook."

When the earnings were released, Timken's stock fell 12% from approximately $17.50 to $15.40 before recovering to a recent close near $16 on extremely high volume.


.




Other News:
Timken Reports Second Quarter 2003 Results
SKF Begins VMZ Restructuring, Cutbacks
EnPro Industries Reports Second Quarter 2003 Results
Timken Named to Top 50 Supplier List by Automotive Industries
NTN Reports First Quarter 2003 Results
The Timken Company Exploring Strategic Options for Standard Plant
An American-Japan Bearing Joint Ventuer Settles in Suzhou,China
Workers on Strike at Gabriel Bearing Plant in India